Kelly Brook is flashing an ‘engagement ring’ she probably bought herself

wenn21243747

Ever since Kelly Brook got engaged to her gladiator famewhore David McIntosh, they’ve been getting pap’d on a daily basis (sometimes multiple times in one day) in LA. Last week she started flashing her engagement ring for the paps too, and the whole thing is so sad and thirsty, I thought I’d help a sister out by writing about her instead of just ignoring her like I did all last week. Here’s what I really don’t understand: if she wanted us to see her ring that badly, why didn’t she just post a ring selfie on her Instagram? Lots of celebrity (and non-celebrity) women do that and it’s a lot less effort than the nonsense happening in these photos. Even worse? UK gossips claim Kelly likely paid for her sad engagement ring herself:

Kelly Brook “probably shelled out” for her own engagement ring. The busty brunette’s beau David McIntosh popped the question last month and she announced the news by posting a snap of her and the former ‘Gladiators’ star holding a balloon with the words ‘Engaged’ emblazoned across the front from her Instagram account.

However, sources allege David is “hardly” romantic and believe Kelly may have paid for the ring since she’s got more money than him. A source told The Sun newspaper: “David proposed without a ring and friends think Kelly probably shelled out for her own. He’s hardly the most romantic man in the world and she’s got far more cash than him.”

However other sources say Kelly dismissed these claims as rubbish – but perhaps the pair went Dutch? Kelly and David – a former royal marine – have had an on/off relationship since they met on New Year’s Eve three months ago and it is believed they “rushed into the engagement”. Although David spent a large amount of time at Kelly’s north London home in the early stages of their romance, the pair reportedly split up shortly after Valentine’s Day.

The source added: “They rushed into the engagement and then realised they needed a ring to prove it’s for real when they got photographed together. Her friends are privately saying they don’t think the romance will last.”

[From The Daily Mirror]

Kelly’s friends are also rushing to the UK tabloids to tell all about how David is a douchebag and how Kelly is so desperate to get married and have babies, she can’t even see how horrible this dude is. I guess that’s possible, but how could THIS dude put any woman in a dong haze? He looks so roidy and gross. Isn’t it far more likely that Kelly just wanted some attention? I doubt this engagement will make it to June.

FFN_Brook_McIntosh_CPR_040414_51373637

FFN_Brook_McIntosh_RocstarFF_040214_51371767

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

21 Responses to “Kelly Brook is flashing an ‘engagement ring’ she probably bought herself”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Elisabeth says:

    who?

  2. QQ says:

    Thanks for not failing me, i ONLY opened this post to see if my new happy place AKA homie giving himself a vasectomy with tight clothes AKA Hulk’s Baby Brother Wearing his cast offs was gonna have new pictures, Please keep em coming

    • mimif says:

      Bahaha I love it, QQ. He looks like an earthbound Buzz Lightyear in that white shirt.

      • marnie says:

        He definitely missed leg day more than a few times 😏

      • Ag says:

        This guy is so gross. And the clothes – good lord. Where does one even buy shit like that? I don’t want to know. (Not that Kelly is a stellar casual dresser herself – hello, Canadian semi-tuxedo.)

  3. Louise says:

    Just think, she once had Billy Zane.

  4. ncboudicca says:

    I have no idea who these people are, but WHY must we shame couples when the woman makes more than the man? I make much, much more than my husband does, but that doesn’t diminish either one of us, turn me into a desperate control freak, or turn him into a henpecked wuss.

    This guy looks like he’s a total douche for other reasons, so let’s just stick to those.

    • Cherry says:

      It’s not about shaming couples when the woman makes more than the man, it’s about shaming people who try to famewhore out their own-bought jewellery by pretending it’s an engagement ring.

      • BendyWindy says:

        They’re engaged, yes? And the ring is a symbol of said engagement? Then it’s an engagement ring. She’s not pretending anything just by virtue of wearing the ring. I don’t know who she is or who he is, but if he’s a douchecanoe, it’s not because she had the money to buy the ring she wanted and he didn’t.

  5. Ainsley says:

    Ugh thats last pic. He needs to quit skipping leg day at the gym :s

  6. M.A.F. says:

    Still have no idea who she is. Going by the fact in the piece that she has a house in north London, I’m going to assume she is some reality star in the UK. And if so, why should I care about her? I only click on this page to see if it would tell me and I’m too lazy to Google.

    • Paige says:

      She’s an aging and ass expanding page 3 girl …where you are topless on page three of the sun newspaper rag….she parlayed that into a lingerie model and whatever famewhoring could get her- calendars, grocery store ribbon cutting, ‘designing clothes’, and of course ‘acting’…this is a sad story but not at all surprising-what else can she do? She could help angelina on a UNICEF mission.

  7. Hiddles forever says:

    I live in Uk and I have seen this woman only in tabloids stories… Gossip girl..

    Sad she bought an engagement ring for herself. I never met anyone THAT desperate….

  8. MissNostalgia says:

    Who are these people and why should we care??

  9. Baskingshark says:

    Up next on Roided-Up Golddigging British Manwhores And The Zelebrity Women They Prey On: Kelly & David vs Katie & Kieran – Will Mr. Price #3 be history before David manages to become Mr. Brook #1? Enquiring minds want to know!