Sandra Bullock in white Giambattista Valli at ‘Gravity’ premiere: lovely or fug?

There were a lot of big-name celebrity women at last night’s NYC premiere of Gravity. At first I thought, “Oh, that’s nice, ladies came out to support Sandra Bullock!” But really, I think some of these ladies came out for George Clooney, because they heard he was in the market for a new girlfriend. Which made it extra-funny to see Katie Holmes there! What if Katie Holmes and George Clooney had a fling?! The gossip universe would meltdown.

As for Sandra, she wore this Giambattista Valli Resort 2014 dress and Giuseppe Zanotti sandals. I’m okay with the dress but I loathe those shoes. While promoting Gravity at the film festivals, Sandra had been wearing more color and it was so good – I’m sad to see her go back to monochromatic stuff. Clooney looks very dapper too – this is the best he’s looked in a while, right?

Emma Watson was at the premiere – she wore this really cute little J.Mendel dress. This a great little dress!

Here’s Katie Holmes in hot pink. I don’t have the designer ID for this. She looks good in this color, but I’d like to see something different with her hair. It looks like she put her greasy, unwashed hair into a high ponytail, which is so wrong because Katie actually does have lovely, thick hair. Update: the dress is Azzedine Alaia.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

49 Responses to “Sandra Bullock in white Giambattista Valli at ‘Gravity’ premiere: lovely or fug?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    I don’t like the dress she has on nor the shoes. Maybe if it was a little longer with a brighter color or black, it would flatter her more.

    But she is definitely a beautiful woman and hair and make up are perfect.

  2. Nev says:

    Katie Holmes looks great!!!!

  3. Andrea1 says:


    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      I thought MJ too when I first saw her. *Sigh* She is looking so harsh. I wouldn’t mind seeing something different with her hair too-the flat-ironed thing just emphasizes the sharp, ‘toxy angles of her face.

      She’s in great shape though, so there’s that.

      • Andrea1 says:

        Yes she is looking very harsh she really need to stop what she is doing as soon as possible else we won’t be able to recognise her anymore and yes that flat ironing has gotten So old she should try something else. Its So sad considering she had an amazing face plus a banging body. He body looks really good for her age but her face..le sigh…

      • Axis2ClusterB says:

        Yeah, that pin-straight hair isn’t doing her any favors. She looks better with loose waves.

  4. davidbowie says:

    What the what is she wearing?!?! Ugh, the dress didn’t need that fug cape(?) extra arm(?) thing. And THOSE shoes…ugh!!!!

    I love Emma’s dress but not the shoes.

  5. SamiHami says:

    I like Sandra’s dress well enough, but I’m not crazy about the stick-straight hair. It would look better with a little body to it. The shoes are just meh.

    Tiny little Emma Watson actually got the dress right for a change, but again, the hair! Something looser would have been better. Love her shoes.

    Katie Holmes…fail. The only thing I like is the color of her dress. The style doesn’t look good on her. And I guess she rounds out the bad hair for this event.

  6. Kiddo says:

    She needs a stylist, STAT. Katie Holmes looks good and seems to be improving on her poses.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Katie looks awesome and I love that color on her.

      • ncmagnolia says:

        She sure does! No more deadman’s stare, looks young, healthy and gorgeous again. This makes me extraordinarily happy. Hope she never lets her guard down where CoS is concerned, though.

  7. Nicolette says:

    Forget the other ladies…….Katie Holmes looks amazing! Confident, happy and no more Stepford Wife glaze.

  8. Patricia says:

    Looking good Katie! I’ve been watching Dawson’s Creek (don’t judge! I’m laid up with a back injury and need to make the time pass lol) and seeing her at that age is so sweet, it makes me so relieved for her that she got away from Tiny Tom, but also sad that she had to go through all that. She has now come out on the other side looking truly happy and better than ever.
    Also, if you want a good laugh some time go ahead and watch a few episodes of Dawson’s Creek, the whining, the platform sandals, the late 90s hahaha so good.

  9. LibsW says:

    Like the dress, hate the shoes. They look as if she got her feet caught in some toilet paper! Katie Holmes’ dress is pretty but to me it should be a bit longer – not sure she has the thighs to carry it off – sorry!

  10. Samtha says:

    Sandra (minus the shoes) and Emma look great. Katie looks like she’s on her way to play tennis.

  11. blue marie says:

    She looks good, but hate the shoes. Emma looks the best of all of them.

  12. socalgal says:

    I’m the opposite. Love the shoes. Think the dress is fug.

  13. eliza says:

    I think I am the only person on earth not excited by this movie. It looks boring to me.

    • freya says:

      You’re not alone. I hear all these people about how scary and intense the trailer is , but it just bores me. Even in 3D. Glad to know I’m not the only one :)

    • glaughy says:

      Nah, I’m not interested either. The trailer was just kinda meh.

  14. MrsBPitt says:

    I think Katie looks great…very happy…its amazing what getting a 170 pound nut off your back can do for a gal!!

  15. Anna says:

    Sandy came in dressed as a Sexy Mummy!

  16. DanaG says:

    Looks like they forgot to sew on the other sleeve. George looks good not so much the grandfather walking his cheerleader grand daughter down the red carpet. So glad the Keibler Elf is gone. Who is next? I thought we would see her by now.

  17. marta says:

    Both Sandra and Katie has horrible leg!!!
    those dresses are too short.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      SANDY has “horrible legs”?
      Are we looking at the same pics?

      • Sullivan says:

        I wondered the same thing. Katie’s legs look great in those photos.

      • loveisthecoal says:

        Sandra? Really? I think her legs are great!

        And yes, it’s true that Katie doesn’t have stick legs, but they look fine to me. I certainly wouldn’t go so far as to call them “horrible.”

    • Marta says:

      their upper part of body is much smaller compared to the legs.their legs are like Doric Columns.

    • Becky1 says:

      I really don’t understand how anyone can say that either of these women have horrible legs. There is nothing wrong with their legs.

  18. ctkat1 says:

    Yes, George looks better than he has in a while, and also, is this the first time that George has been single in years?

    Because the playbook specifies that he dumps the former girlfriend in the Spring, and gets the new girlfriend in place over the summer at Como so that they’ve been together for 5-6 months by the time award season arrives. And this year…no girlfriend roll-out.
    I believe those Eva Longoria rumors- I think she was his choice for the next girlfriend, and it got all cocked up and now he’s (FINALLY! MAYBE!) going to do an award season without a budget lady on his arm.

    Katie Holmes looks cute, Sandra looks nice but boring, Emma is adorable.

  19. Quinn says:

    I no longer look at Katie Holmes like she would have a personality. Can’t help it.

    And she and Christina Aquilara have the same shaped legs…not good for mini skirts, and they both insist on them.

  20. Cecilia says:

    I absolutely adore Emma’s dress. It is perfect. Katie looks really good here, even her legs. How did she do that? Poor Sandra has headed down the road of no return with her face. Something is way off about Sandra…can’t put my finger on it. She has skeletons in her closet.

  21. Grant says:

    Great legs on Katie!

  22. Common Sense says:

    I am so excited to see gravity, I don’t think I have ever been this excited about a film before. It has been getting really amazing reviews, not just good or great but exceptional reviews, along with Sandra’s perfomance. Way to go Sandra!

  23. Rude but kind says:

    Sandra doesn’t got the legs for it, which is a shame ’cause otherwise she’s so beautiful. She has had recently really good fashion choices, except this one. Sidenote Katie Holmes got fat?

  24. mslewis says:

    I like Sandy’s dress AND shoes but the dress is a bit too short and not age-appropriate. I know she’s 48 and in Hollywood but she really does need to stop doing what she’s doing to her face. She’s going to look like Meg Ryan in a minute.

    Emma Watson’s dress is perfection for a girl with no boobies. It’s just really pretty. She doesn’t always dress as well as she should but I really like this one.

    Katie Holmes looks happy and healthy and young!! It makes me happy to see her looking so great. Love the color of the dress.

  25. Anguishedcorn says:

    I truly dislike Sandra’s hair here; so hot-ironed and thin looking. Also, the dress and shoes are marginal.

    I was shocked to see how great Katie Holmes’s legs look! She’s actuall been working out and they no longer look like flaccid meat sticks. Way to go!

  26. aemish says:

    she looks amazing and I have shoe envy! I think the dress is perfect for the movie and very futuristic

  27. taxi says:

    SB’s dress isn’t flattering. The asymmetrical tummy drape makes her rear look big. Her figure is good but it’s time to lengthen the hems. And lose the flat-iron.

  28. StaCat1 says:

    I think they all look great. Emma watson’s dress is amazeballs.

  29. Kosmos says:

    Ditto, I’m not fond of that dress for Sandra, maybe a slight bit too short for her, and the shoes don’t look quite right either…Katie Holmes seems to have heavy legs, so I would go easy on this length for her. I don’t think the cut of the dress was very flattering for her and her makeup looks a bit washed out, but maybe it’s the lighting? After all, she is now the face of Bobbi Brown, so you’d think she would look a bit more outstanding?